Publishers | Practical Checklist

Does your editorial and submission policy include:

Open access as the default.
Provisions for cases of closed access.
Statement on licenses (default, alternative).
Sanctions for non-compliance.
A data availability statement.

Have you established criteria for the peer-review process of research data?
Have you established criteria for data citation?
Do you provide a list of recommended repositories for data submission?
Do you require open licenses (such as Creative Commons) for research data accompanying publications?

The PLOS Mandatory Policy for Open Access to Research Data

PLOS instituted a mandatory open access policy for all research data supporting PLOS publications with rare exceptions. Researcher compliance with PLOS's policy is stated in the Data Availability Statement submitted by the author simultaneously with the submission of the manuscript, and published as part of the final article in cases of successful submissions. Authors are required to deposit their data in recommended certified data centers and repositories. Small data sets can be uploaded data with manuscripts. PLOS' Editorial and Submission Policies provide support, guidance and assistance provided to researchers to allow them to comply with the journals' open data policy. In cases where restrictions to access are noticed following publication PLOS reserves the right to post a correction, contact the authors' institution or funders or even retract the publication.

Source: http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action#sharing

The Geoscience Data Journal

The Geoscience Data Journal is an online journal published by Wiley. It publishes short data papers which are linked to their relevant data sets. The journal collaborates with a number of data centers and repositories, where the relevant data sets can be deposited by authors. The latter provide trusted loci to store data and link to via a DOI. Data creators attain full credit for their efforts, while also improving the scientific record by providing access to research data that is fully described, edited and discovered.

Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2049-6060

The Journal of Open Archaeology

The Journal of Open Archaeology (JOAD) applies a peer review process to all submitted data papers against two criteria: the paper content and the deposited data. According to the journal, the former is about providing information regarding the creation and re-use of the dataset as well as a description of the dataset, while the latter is among others about the submission of data to a repository with a sustainability mode, its licensing.

Source: http://openarchaeologydata.metajnl.com
and http://openarchaeologydata.metajnl.com/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

The FORCE11 Data Citation Principles

To enhance the proliferation of high quality research data, contribute towards according research data due significance in the research process and encourage good practice, FORCE11 issued overarching principles for data citation. The principles work on the premise that data citations need to be both human and machine-readable. They are not comprehensive, but are rather meant to encourage communities to develop practices and tools that embody them.

The principles are: importance of data citations; data citations to facilitate credit and attribution; data citations to provide evidence for claims; data citation to include machine actionable and globally unique persistent identifier; data citations to facilitate access to the data themselves. In addition, data citations should be: persistent; facilitate identification of, access to, and verification of the specific data that support a claim; be interoperable and flexible.

Source: https://www.force11.org/datacitation

Suggestion

We recommend reading about data managers too. These include repositories such as data centres, libraries, archives and memory institutions.