entry author entry date entry editor document type
Mike Pincombe May 2009 pamphlet

A Pithy Note to Papists


Authors
full name additional information

Thomas Knell the Younger [T. Knel. Iuni.]

Author

Publication Details

Composition date
information
Between 8 and 23 August 1570. Felton was executed on the one and the pamphlet was published on the other.
Publication date
information
23 August 1570
Publication site
London
format
Quarto, 18 pp. collated AB4, C1; mainly balckletter.
Bibliographic number
STC2 15034
Stationers register
Not in SR.
Associates
full name additional information

John Allde [Alde]

Printer

Languages
English
Latin

Content

Title page
A piththy [sic] note to Papists all and some that ioy in Feltons martirdome Desiring them to read this and to iudge not in spite at simple trust to grudge. Set foorth by one that knew his life, and was with him at the houre of his death, which was the viii. of August. Anno. 1570. at the west end of Paules Churche ouer against the Bishops gate, where he set vp the Bul. Imprinted at London : at the long shop adioyning vnto Saint Mildreds Church in the Pultrie the xxiii. of August by John Allde.
Synopisis
This is a lively and partisan account of the execution of John Felton in August 1570.
General Commentary
1. Historical. - John Felton was a wealthy Surrey gentleman who published the bull Regnans in excelsis, in which Pius V excommunicated queen Elizabeth, by nailing a copy to the door of the palace of the bishop of London on 25 May 1570, near St Paul's Cathedral. He was subsequently arrested and tried for treason on the grounds that he 'declared that the queen . . . ought not to be the queen of England' (qtd by Lock). He was arraigned at the Guildhall on 4 August, and executed four days later at the scene of his crime on 8 August. On the scaffold, Felton refused to repent, denying that he had offended the queen in any way and thereby asserting his innocence of the charge of treason. He also refused the comfort of the Protestant clergy appointed to assist him and made a very public Catholic end to his life. Knell was at the execution and some details in his account of Felton's final moments ring true and can be corroborated by other records (such as his prayer in Latin). But Knell's partisanship is evident in other details, such as his insistence that Felton refused to call on Christ but put his faith in the pope. But other reports of the execution say that Felton's last word was the name of Jesus, and this would be expected from any Christian at the hour of his or her death, whether Protestant or Catholic. (b) Thomas Knell the younger (1543/5-c. 1592) wrote his Epitaph upon Doctor Bonner at the start of his rather unsuccessful career as a clergyman. He was ordained priest by Edmund Grindal, bishop of London, on 17 April 1568, and went on to serve as curate in St James Garlickhithe in 1568, at St Giles Cripplegate in 1569, and back at St James in 1570. Apaprently unable to to secure a vicarship, Knell may have turned to 'the Elizabethan equivalent of tabloid journalism' (Usher) to earn a little money and improve his profile amongst the godly. His first published work was his Epitaph upon Doctor Bonner#, who died in the Marshalsea in September 1569, but Knell was soon at work on his Pithy Note to Papists in 1570, and a year later he wrote his Life and Death of Doctor Story, Bonner's chancellor, executed in June 1571. Knell's animosity towards these 'papists' is likely to have been genuine enough, for he seems to have been unable to conform to the new Elizabethan religious settlement and left the capital for his native county of Kent in 1573, where he died 20 years later in 1592, as a clerk as a clerk in the parish of Kenardington.

2. Critical. - Knell's verses are generally assured, though he has a tendency, still admissible in the early Elizabethan period, of making lines metrical by repeating pronouns, e.g. 'she ought not haue it shee' (B1r). His style is relatively plain, and its most salient rhetorical episode is the forceful use of anaphora which lists the crimes of 'Iohn Felton Traitor' on sig. B2r. One or two rare words - pleaseman (A4r) and drail (B3r) - may not have seeemed so striking in 1570. Given the Calvinist cast of his writing, it is odd that he refers so little to Scripture. His only references are to Malachi (A2v) and Psalms (A4v). On the other hand, we are not presented with the display of erudition in litterae humaniores with which Knell adorns his Epitaph upon Doctor Bonner. Again, there are only two such allusions: a casual comparison of Felton to the braggart soldier Thraso from Terence's Eunuchus (A4r); and a much more important and extended identification of Felton as a 'new stert up Herostratus' (B2r). Herostratus was one of the great paradoxes of the tradition of fame poetry: he sought to win fame by burning down the Temple of Diana at Ephesus; but it was decreed that his name should be erased from the historical record. The story was well known to English readers from various sources, particularly, though in slightly altered form, Chaucer's House of Fame. Knell inverts the tale so that Felton will be remembered for all time because the memory of his words and deeds shall be forever inscribed upon the very fabric of the building in which he was arraigned (the Guildhall), imprisoned (Newgate), and executed (St Paul's). Knell is especially eloquent in his description of the Guildhall, where 'Dame Fame with Eccho shall resound | in eu'ry caue to walke. | Iohn Felton Papist heer was raigned, | that Traiterous rebel meer' (B2v). Finally, it is worth noting that, for all his hostility towards Felton, Knell does at least allow that he was an antagonist worhty of respect. In his libel of Felton, Knell states that he should not be regarded as a 'papist', 'for Papists are deuout' (A4v). The allusion to Thraso refers to the soldier as a godless 'scoffer' (A4r) - a miniature Tamburlaine avant la lettre. But Knell cannot help deviating from this initial representation when he comes to describing his resolute defiance of his persecutors in the narrative section of the poem. Here - try as he might to demonstrate that Felton was a mere time-server - Knell gives us a portrait of Felton as an example of principled devotion to the rival sectarian cause. The more he struggles to hide this portrait beneath a blackwash of calumny and sarcasm, the more we come to distrust and despise Felton's detractor Knell. Perhaps Knell felt a genuine though fearful admiratio for the 'papist' Felton as a mirror image of his own devotion to Protestant reform, hence his uneasy and overstated response to the contemporary Catholic interpretation of Felton's martyrdom.
References and Further Reading
Lock, Julian, 'Felton, John (d. 1570), Roman Catholic martyr', ODNB
Usher, Brett, 'Knell, Thomas, the younger (1543/4-c. 1592), Church of England clergyman and pamphleteer', ODNB
Preliminary Matter
1. Title-page [as above]. - A1r
Main Text
2. Poem: [No title], 536 lines in ballad metre (abcb), quatrain breaks marked by uncial C), beginning: 'LOng lenitie abusde, at length | dooth lend deserued hire' (A2r-C1v). - The poem sets out to scotch the Catholic claim that Felton was a martyr by insisting that he was, on the contrary, merely a traitor. Knell begins by associating Felton with other Catholics executed for treason: 'ye Nortons twain' (A2r), viz. Richard and Christopher Norton, executed for thei rpart in the Rising in the North in 1570; then he moves to deny Felton's status as a martyr be insisting that 'eu'ry kinde of death dooth not | deserue a Martyrs name' (A3r). True martyrs must die for the true faith, and he names Ignatius, Cassianus, Laurence, Saints Steven and Peter, Maturus 'and the rest | that suffred for the light' (A3r-v). But Felton, he claims, was a 'roisting shifting Prodigall' (A3v). Felton, he concludes, was simply an 'irreligious Traitor' (A4r), like Eleazar, Jehonaan, Simeon. The rest of the poem gives a fairly detailed account of Felton's conduct from his arraignment in the Guildhall to his final execution at St Paul's on 8 August 1570. However, the 'content' of Knell's report of these events poses problems to the student, since they cannot be taken at face value. Knell puts his own Calvinist interpretation on Felton's words and actions, and one is tempted to believe that some of these are actually of Knell's own invention. For example, Knell explains Felton's refusal to hearken to the Protestant divines appointed to persuade him to repent on the scaffold as a sign of his reprobacy: 'But GOD (I think) had then shut vp | the bowelles of his grace: | To him, whose stubburn hart before | refusde truthe to imbrace' (B4r). He then relates how Felton was seized by despair: 'For Miserere on his knées | all trembling he did say'. Other accounts confirm that Felton prayed in Latin before he died, but Knell adds the detail of his trembling. Similarly, though he concedes that other reports of Felton's behaviour on the scaffold say that he 'did Gods mercy then desire' (A4v); but Knell argues an equivocation: 'But who can say he shewd such faith | as made him right repente?' Partisan mendacity is perhaps only to be expected in a pamphlet of this kind, but Knell seems even less trustworthy than most of his co-sectarians in this regard.
Postliminary Matter
3. Signature: 'Amen. quod T. Knel. Iuni.'
Colophon
None.
Genres
“controversial writing” “history” “news” “verse”
Subjects
“Rome church of” “faith” “heresy and heretics” “martyrs” “papistry and papists” “treason and sedition”

Extra

Compilation editions
edition title information bib.no.

The text used is the Lambeth Palace Library copy of STC 15034: A Piththy note to papistes, as repr. by EEBO.