Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1187 [1186]

K. Henry. 8. Bibles in Englishe. Barnes, Garret, and Hierome, Martyrs.

now M. Grafton at this tyme I haue specially called you to be a witnes with me that vpon this translation of Bishops Sees,MarginaliaBoner sweareth hartely to the kynges supremacie. I must accordyng to the statute take an othe vnto the kyngs maiestie knowledgyng hys Supremacy, which before God I take with my hart and so thinke hym to be, and beseech almighty God to saue hym, and long to prosper hys grace: hold the booke sirah, and read you the oth (sayd he) to one of hys chapleins, and he layd his hande on the booke and so tooke hys othe. And after this he shewed great frendshippe to the sayd Grafton, and to hys partener Edward Whitchurch,MarginaliaMyles Couerdall corrector in printing the Bible of the large volume. but specially to Myles Couerdall, who was the corrector of the great Bible.  

Commentary   *   Close

Miles Coverdale, a superb Latinist with no Greek or Hebrew, had been given the task of revising the Matthew Bible and removing its marginal and other notes.

[Back to Top]

Now, after that the foresayd letters were deliuered, the Frenche kyng gaue very good wordes,  

Commentary   *   Close

Francis I's licence, issued in response to a letter of Henry's, procured through Cromwell, of 23 June 1538, contained the proviso that the translation should contain no "private or erroneous opinions" (privatus aut illegittimus opiniones), a phrase that made Francis I's permission more qualified than might be immediately apparent.

[Back to Top]
and was well content to permit the doyng therof. And so the printer went forward and printed forth the booke euen to þe last part, & then was there a quarell picked to the printer, and he was sent for to the inquisitors of the fayth,  
Commentary   *   Close

The inquisitors had been ordered to their task in December 1538, in response to a directive of Pope Paul III that Bibles "corruptly" translated into English be made liable to confiscation and burning.

and there charged with certayne articles of heresie.MarginaliaThe printing of the Byble stayd at Paris thorough the practise of Englishe Byshops. Then were sent for the Englishmen that were at the cost and charge therof, and also suche as had the correction of the same, which was Myles Couerdale, but hauyng some warnyng what would folow, the sayd englishemen posted away as fast as they could to saue themselues, leauing behynd them all their Bibles, whiche were to the number of 2500. called the Bibles of the great volume, and neuer recouered any of thē,MarginaliaEnglishe bibles burnt at Paris. sauing that þe Lieftenaunt criminall hauing them deliuered vnto him to burn in a place of Paris (like Smithfield) called Maulbert place was somewhat moued with couetousnes, and sold 4. great dry fattes  
Commentary   *   Close

I.e., vats or barrels.

of them to a Haberdasher to lappe in cappes  
Commentary   *   Close

I.e., to line hats.

, and those were bought agayne but the rest were burned, to the great & importunate losse of those that bare þe charge of thē. But notwithstandyng the sayd losse after they had recouered some parte of the foresayde bookes, and were comforted and encouraged by the Lorde Cromwel,MarginaliaHow Grafton & Whitchurch became printers. the sayd Englishe men went agayne to Paris, and there gotte the presses letters, and seruantes of the aforesaid Printer,  
Commentary   *   Close

The French constable eventually dropped the charge of heresy, and allowed the type, printers, and unused paper to be returned to England. As only bound copies had been burned, Grafton and Whitchurch were able to bring back with them salvaged, unbound copies of about half of the already-printed Old Testament and most of the New.

[Back to Top]
& brought them to Londō, and there they became printers themselues  
Commentary   *   Close

Grafton and Whitchurch set up their London operation in what, before their dissolution, had been the buildings housing the Grey Friars, just north of St. Paul's.

(which before they neuer entended) and printed out the said Bible  
Commentary   *   Close

On 25 April, 1541, the privy council licensed Anthony Marler, haberdasher, and, later, the first person to be appointed royal printer, to secure a four years' fixed-price monopoly to sell "the Bibles of the Great Volume" unbound at 10 shillings and bound at 12 shillings. On 1 May of the same year the council also granted Marler's petition again to issue proclamations enjoining every parish church to purchase the Bible in English, for otherwise (as he declared in his supplication) he would be financially ruined, burdened as he was with an "importune sum of the said books now lying in [his] hand."

[Back to Top]
in London, and after that printed sundry impressiōs of them: but yet not without great trouble and losse, for the hatred of the bishops namely Steuen Gardiner, and his felowes, who mightily did stomacke and malign the printyng therof.

[Back to Top]

Here by the way, for the more direction to the story  

Commentary   *   Close

Here Foxe turns to a retrospective account of the Thomas Matthew Bible.

, thou hast louyng Reader, to note and vnderstand that in those dayes there were ij. sūdry Bibles in English  
Commentary   *   Close

I.e., Coverdale's Bible of 1535 and the Matthew Bible of 1537.

, Printed and set forth, bearyng diuers titles, and Printed in diuers places. The first was called Thomas Mathewes Bible  
Commentary   *   Close

This folio version of the English-language Bible, an amalgam of Tyndale's and Coverdale's earlier translations, was actually compiled in Antwerp in 1537 by the English clergyman John Rogers.

, printed at Hambrough,MarginaliaOf this Bible Printed at Hambrough, read before pag. about the yeare of our Lord. 1532. the Correctour of which Printe was then Iohn Rogers, of whom ye shall heare more Christ willing hereafter. The Printers were Richard Grafton, and Whitchurch.MarginaliaTho. Mathewes Byble by whō and how. In the translation of this Bible, the greatest doer was in deede William Tyndall, who with the helpe of Miles Couerdale had translated all the bookes thereof, except onely the Apocripha, and certeine notes in the margent, which were added after. But because the sayd William Tyndall in the meane tyme was apprehended before this Bible was fully perfected, it was thought good to them which had the doing therof, to chaunge the name of William Tyndall, because that name then was odious, and to father it by a straunge name of Thomas Mathew,  
Commentary   *   Close

Tyndale's name being now tainted with the fact of his execution for heresy, Rogers instead attributed the edition to a "Thomas Matthew," a pseudonym possibly derived from the names of the two apostles. Grafton and Whitchurch sponsored a print run of 1,500 copies of Matthew's Bible in Antwerp that was shipped to London in 1537.

[Back to Top]
Iohn Rogers the same tyme beyng Correctour to the Print, who had then translated the residue of the Apocripha, and added also certaine notes thereto in the margent, and thereof came it to bee called Thomas Mathewes Bible.MarginaliaThe Bible presented to the kyng by the Lord Cromwell. Which Bible of Thomas Mathew, after it was imprinted and presented to the Lord Cromwell, and the Lord Cranmer Archbyshop of Caunterbury, who liked very well of it, the sayd Cromwell presented it to the kyng,  
Commentary   *   Close

Cranmer liked it enough to pass on a copy to Cromwell in August of that same year.

and obteined that the same might freely passe to be read of his subiectes with his graces licence:MarginaliaThe Bible put forth wyth the kinges priuilege. So that there was Printed vpon the same booke, one lyne in red letters with these wordes: Set forth with the Kynges most gracious licence.  
Commentary   *   Close

Cromwell managed to procure royal licence for this edition pursuant to his own programme to place a vernacular Bible in all parish churches. Coverdale's Bible of 1535 boasted only of a dedication to the king; this was a further step towards the eventual authorization of the Great Bible of 1539.

The settyng forth of this booke did not a litle offend the Clergy, namely the Byshop aforesayd, both for the Prologues, & specially because in the same booke was one speciall table collected of the common places in the Bible, and the Scriptures for the approbation of the same, & chiefly about the Supper of the Lord and Mariage of Priestes, and the Masse, which there was said not to be found in Scripture.  
Commentary   *   Close

Coverdale was ordered to revise these potentially heretical marginal notes the 1539 Bible.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaAn other Byble of the great volume printed at Paris. Furthermore, after the restreynt of this foresayd Bible of Mathew, an other Bible began to be Printed at Paris, an. 1540. Which was called the Bible of the large Volume.  

Commentary   *   Close

Here Foxe returns to his story of the abortive Paris printing, which was actually attempted in 1538 and shifted successfully to London in 1539.

The Printers whereof were the foresayd Richard Grafton, and Whitchurche whiche bare the charges. A great helper thereto was the Lord Cromwel. The chiefest ouerseer was Myles Couerdale, who taking the translation of Tyndall, conferred the same with the Hebrue, and amended many thynges.MarginaliaThe Byshops offended at the Byble translated into Englishe. In this Bible, although the former notes of Thomas Mathew was omitted, yet sondry markes and hands were annexed in the sides, which ment that in those places should be made certeine notes, wherewith also the Clergy was offended, though the notes were not made.

[Back to Top]

After this, the Byshops bringyng their purpose to passe, brought the Lorde Cromwell out of fauour, and shortly to hys death: and not long after great complaint was made to the king of the translation of the Bible, and of the preface of the same,MarginaliaThe sale of the Bible stayde by the king through the bishops meanes. and then was the sale of the Bible commaunded to be stayed, the B. promising to amend & correct it, but neuer performyng the same: Then Grafton was called, & first charged with the Printyng of Mathewes Bible, but he beyng very fearefull of trouble, made excuses for hymselfe in all thynges. Then was he examined of the great Bible, and what notes he was purposed to make. To the which he aunswered, that hee knewe none. For his purpose was to haue retayned learned men to haue made the notes, but when he perceaued the kynges maiestie, and hys Clergye not willyng to haue any, he proceded no further.MarginaliaRich. Grafton imprisoned for printing the byble. But for al these excuses, Grafton was sent to the Fleete,  

Commentary   *   Close

Grafton was imprisoned once in 1541 and twice more in 1543 on similar charges.

and there remayned vi, wekes, and before he came out, was bounde in CCC. li.  
Commentary   *   Close

I.e., his assurance was underwritten with a 300 pound fine.

that he should neyther sell nor imprint or cause to be imprinted any moe Bibles, vntill the kynge and the clergye shoulde agree vpon a translation. And thus was þe Bible from that tyme stayed,  
Commentary   *   Close

No revisions nor new versions of the English Bible were commissioned or printed for the remainder of Henry's reign.

duryng the reygne of Kynge Henry the viij.

[Back to Top]

But yet one thyng more is to be noted, that after the imprinters hadde lost theyr Bibles, they contynued suters to Boner, as is aforesayd to bee a meane for to obteyne of the Frenche kyng theyr bookes agayn: but so long they continued suters, and Boner euer fedde them with faire words promysing them much, but dyd nothyng for them, til at the last Boner was discharged of hys ambassade, and returned home, where he was right ioyfully welcomed home by the Lorde Cromwell, who loued hym very dearely, and hade a meruelous good opinion of hym.  

Commentary   *   Close

Once again, Foxe backtracks in his account.

MarginaliaEdm. Boner a great frend to the L. Cromwell all the tyme of hys prosperitie. And so long as Cromwell remayned in authoritie, so long was Boner at his becke, & frende to hys frendes, and enemy to his enemyes: as namely at that tyme to Gradiner bishop of Winchester, who neuer fauoured Cromwell, and therfore Boner could not fauour hym, but that hee and Winchester were the greatest enemies that might be.MarginaliaS. Gardiner and Boner, of enemies made frendes. But so sone as Cromwell fell, immediatly Boner and Winchester pretended to be the greatest men that lyued, and no good word coulde Boner speake of Cromwell, but the lewdest, vilest, & bitterest that hee coulde speake,MarginaliaDoct. Boner altereth his frendship & religion. callyng hym the rankest heretycke that euer lyued: and then such as the sayd Boner knew to be in good fauour with Cromwell, hee coulde neuer abide their sight. In so muche as the next day after that Cromwell was apprehended, the abouenamed Grafton, who before had bene very familiar with Boner, mette with the sayd Boner sodenly, and sayd vnto him, that hee was sory to heare of the newes that then was abroad. What are they, said hee? Of the apprehension of the L. Cromwell, sayde Grafton. Are ye sory for that (sayd he?) It had bene good that he had ben dispatched long agoe. With that Grafton looked vppon hym and knew not what to saye, but came noe more to Boner.MarginaliaDoctor Boner against the Lorde Cromwell. Howbeit afterward the sayde Grafton beyng charged for the imprintyng of a Balet made in the fauour of Cromwel  
Commentary   *   Close

Cromwell had himself been known to employ ballad-mongering for political purchase; a number of both pro- and anti-Cromwellian ballads were circulating by the time of his execution.

was called before the Councell where Boner was present, and there Boner charged hym with the w0ordes that hee spake to hym of Cromwell, and tolde out a great long tale. But the Lord Awdeley, who then was Lorde Chauncellour, ryght discretly and honorably cut of the matter, and entered into other talke.

[Back to Top]
The history of Robert Barnes, Thomas Garret, and William Hierome, diuines.  
Commentary   *   Close
Barnes, Garrett and Jerome

This lengthy section narrates the lives and deaths of the three most prominent evangelicals executed for heresy by Henry VIII after the break with Rome, on each of whom see the ODNB. It is also a section which was extensively rewritten by Foxe between the 1563 and 1570 editions, although after 1570 only one, very minor change was made to the text. The account of Barnes in the 1563 edition drew principally on three sources. First was Barnes' autobiographical account in his A supplicacion vnto the most gracyous prynce H. the .viij. (STC 1471: London, 1534), sigs. F1r-I3r. This was extended, and slightly altered, from the account given in the 1531 edition of the Supplication, a text which Foxe apparently did not know. Alongside this was Edward Hall and Richard Grafton, The vnion of the two noble and illustrate famelies of Lancastre & Yorke (STC 12721: London, 1548), part II, fos. 241v-243r; and Barnes' protestation from the stake, found in John Standish, A lytle treatise composyd by Johan Standysshe, against the protestacion of R. Barnes (STC 23209: London, 1540) and reproduced in full by Foxe. In the 1570 rewriting, a new section was added, based on the detailed narrative in Stephen Gardiner, A declaration of such true articles as George Ioye hath gone about to confute as false (STC 11588: London, 1546).The main source for the account of Thomas Garret is a lengthy testimony of events in 1528 written by Anthony Dalaber, apparently specifically for Foxe's use. As Foxe tells us (1583, p. 1197), Dalaber died in Salisbury diocese in 1562, leaving his account unfinished. His text is reproduced apparently in full in 1563. There are some minor abridgements of Dalaber's account in 1570 and subsequent editions, mostly to omit digressions, lists of names or personal details apparently irrelevant to Garret's case. The remainder of Foxe's account of Garret is far sketchier and is assembled from the accounts of unnamed 'auncient and credible persones'.The source for the short account of William Jerome, which only appears in 1570 and subsequent editions, is unclear. Almost all of the information here can be substantiated from three documents in the State Papers (National Archives, SP 1 / 158 fos. 50-2, 120, 124-5 (LP XV 354.1, 411.2, 414), but these do not appear to be Foxe's sources, not least because none of them refer to Dr. Wilson's role, which is otherwise unrecorded. The account appears to be based entirely on a summary of Jerome's recantation sermon, given at St. Mary Spital on 29 March 1540, the Monday of Easter week.Alec Ryrie

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaRob. Barnes. T. Garret, W. Hierome Martirs. LIke as in foreine battailes the chief poynt of Victorye cōsisteth in the safetie of the Generall or Captayn: euen so whē the valiaunt standerd bearer and stay of the Church of England, Tho. Cromwell I meane, was made away, pitie it is to beholde, what miserable slaughter of good men and good wemen ensued therupon, whereof we haue nowe (Christ willyng) to entreat. For Winchester hauyng now gotten his full purpose, and fre swynge to exercise his crueltye, wonder it was to se that Aper Calydonius, or (as the scripture speaketh) that Ferus singularis,MarginaliaPsal. [illegible text]0. what troubles he raised in the Lords vineyard. And least by delayes he might loose the occasion presently offered, he strayght wayes made his first assaultes vpon Robert Barnes, Thomas Garret & Williā Hierom, whom in the very same moneth within. ij. dayes after Cromwels death  

Commentary   *   Close

This corrects the chronological error in the 1563 edition.

, he caused to be put to execu-

[Back to Top]
tion
LLL.iiij.