MarginaliaAn. 1555. October.Touchyng the memorable Actes and doyngs of this worthy mā, among many other this is not to be neglected, what a bold enterprise he attempted in sendyng to kyng Henry a present: the maner whereof was this.
This implausible story first appeared in an appendix to the 1563 edition (p. 1734) and was integrated into the section containing Latimer's letters in the 1570 edition.
Fornicatores & adulteros iudicabit Dominus.
Not translated.
God will judge fornicators and adulterers.
fornicatores enim et adulteros iudicabit Deus.
And thus hast thou, gētle reader, the whole lyfe, both of M. Rydley, and of M. Latymet, two worthy doers in the Church of CHRIST, seuerally and by them selues set forth and described with all their doynges, writynges, disputations, sufferynges, theyr paynfull trauails, faythfull preachynges, studious seruice in CHRISTES Church, their pacient imprisonment, and constant fortitude in that which they had taught, with all other their procedynges frō time to tyme, since their first springyng yeares, to this present tyme and moneth of Queene Mary, beyng the moneth of October. an. 1555. MarginaliaB. Ridley, & M. Latymer brought forth to examinatiō. MarginaliaOctober. 1.In the which moneth they were both brought forth together to their finall examination and execution. Wherfore, as we haue heretofore declared both their lyues seuerally and distinctly one from the other, so now ioyntly to couple them both together as they were together ioyned in one societie of cause and Martyrdome, we will by the grace of CHRIST prosecute the rest that remaineth concernyng their latter examination, disgradyng, and constant sufferyng, with þe order & maner also of the Cōmissioners, which were MarginaliaM. White B. of Lincolne M. Brokes B. of Glocester the Popes deputies.M. White Byshop of Lyncolne, M. Brokes Bishop of Glocester, with others: and what were their wordes, their obiections, their Oratiōs there vsed, and what agayne were the aunsweres of these men to the same, as in processe here foloweth to be seene.
[Back to Top]There were relatively brief accounts of the examinations of Ridley and Latimer, on both 30 September and 1 October, in the Rerum (pp. 705-08). These accounts were clearly based on the commission to examine the two bishops, the articles on which they were interrogated and brief versions of their replies. Foxe obviously had copies of the first two documents in exile, supplemented with what may well have been a copy one of the notarial records of the examinations. Curiously, there was nothing in the Rerum on the condemnation and degradation of Ridley and Latimer and only a terse note of their executions (Rerum, p. 538).
[Back to Top]This deficiency was made good in the 1563 edition. The entire accounts of the examinations, condemnations, and executions of the two martyrs were first printed in this edition as well as the accounts of Ridley's degradation and his behaviour on his final night on earth. These accounts, apart from one famous, almost certainly apocryphal, remark first attributed to Latimer in the 1570 edition,were substantially unchanged in subsequent editions.
[Back to Top]What were Foxe's sources for this wealth of information? Ridley's examinations may have been written by Ridley himself; if not, they were certainly written by a co-religionist. But Ridley could not have recorded Latimer's examinations as he was not present at them; they were probably recorded by a sympathetic observer, quite possibly at Ridley's instruction. (They do not appear to have been written by Latimer himself; for one thing, the detailed descriptions of Latimer's dress and appearance suggest that the bishop did not describe his own examinations). Ridley's condemnation, degradation, behaviour in his final days and his execution were all recounted to Foxe by George Shipside, Ridley's devoted brother-in-law. (Shipside is specifically mentioned as being present on each of these occasions and the accounts frequently address a concern of his: Ridley's efforts to have leases bestowing property on Shipside's wife honoured by Mary). Augustine Bernher, Latimer's amanuensis, was very probably present at the bishops's execution and he may well have been a source for Foxe as well.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe last examination of B. Ridley & M. Latymer.FIrst, after the appearing of Tho. Cranmer Archbishop of Cant. before the Popes Delegate, and the Queenes Commissioners in S. Maries Church at Oxford, about the. xij. day of September, whereof more shall be sayd (by the Lords grace) when wee come to the death of the said Archbishop: shortly after, vpon the xxviij. day of the sayd moneth of September, was sent downe to Oxford an other Commission
From here down to the words 'all such heresy and schism' Foxe is clearly quoting from the commission to examine the bishops.
There are three types of papal (personal representatives of the pope): a legatus natus, a nuncio and a legate à latere. A legatus natus is the holder of an office (e.g., the archbishopric of Canterbury before the reformation) which automatically confers legatine status on the officeholder. Today a numcio is a diplomatic representaive from the Holy See, but in the sixteenth century he was a papal official with the authority to collect revenue due to the papacy from a particular province. Legates à latere acted as deputies for the pope on important missions. They have full papal power in much the same way as a viceroy has royal powers. The trials of Ridley and Latimer were conducted under Cardinal Pole's legatine authority.
[Back to Top]Mary's government refused to accept the validity of ordinations conducted under the 1550 ordinal, which included the episcopal ordinations of Latimer and Ridley.
The period between Henry VIII's break with Rome and Mary's accession.
Pope: but if the sayd Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley would stoutly & stubburnly defend and mayntayne these their erronious assertiōs, that then the said Lords by their commission, should proceede in forme of iudgement according to the law of Heretickes, that is, degrading them from their promotion and dignity of Bishops, Priestes, and all other ecclesiasticall orders, shoulde pronounce them as Hereticks, and therefore cleane to cut them of from the Church, and so to yelde them to receaue punishment, due to all such heresye and schisme.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaD. Ridley & Master Latymer ascited to appeare, the last of Septemb.Wherfore, the last of September, the said two persons Nicolas Ridley and Hugh Latimer were ascited to appeare before the sayd Lords, in þe diuinitie schoole at Oxford, at. viij. of the clocke. At what tyme thyther repayred the Lordes,
The bishops trying Ridley and Latimer: Bishop White of Lincoln, Bishop Brooks of Gloucester and Bishop Holyman of Bristol.
Separately.
Repeatedly.
MarginaliaThe wordes of the Bishop of Lincol. to Doctor Ridley, for not putting of his cappe.Linc. M. Ridley, although neyther I, neither my Lordes here in respect of our own persons do looke for cappe or knee, yet because we beare and represent such persons as we do, that is, my Lord Cardinalls grace, Legate a latere to the Popes holynes, as well in that he is of a noble parentage, and (therewith M. Rydley moued his cap with lowely obeysaunce) descending from the regall bloud, as in that he is a man worthy to bee reuerenced with all humility for his great knowledge and learning, noble vertues, and godly lyfe, and especially in that hee is here in England Deputy to the Popes holines, it should haue becommed you at hys name to haue discouered your head. Wherefore except you will of your owne selfe take the paines to put your hand to your head, and at the nomination, as well of the sayd Cardinall, as of the Popes holines vncouer the same, lest that this your contumacy
Contempt, disrespect.
MarginaliaAnswere of Doctor Ridley, to the B. of Lincol.Rid. As touching that you sayd (my Lord) that you of your owne persons desyre ne cap ne knee, but onely requyre the same in consideration that you represent the Cardinals graces person, I do you to wit, and therupon make my protestation, that I did put on my cap at the naming of the Cardinals grace neyther for any contumacy that I beare towardes your own persons, neither for any derogation of honour toward the Lord Cardinalls grace. For I knowe him to bee a man worthy of all humility, reuerence, and honour, in that he came of the most regall bloud, & in that he is a man endued with manifold graces of learning and vertue: and as touching these vertues and poyntes, MarginaliaDoctor Ridley reuerēceth the person of the Cardinall, but not his Legacie.I with all humility (therewith he put of his cap, and bowed his knee) and obeysaunce that I may, will reuerence and honour his grace: but in that he is Legate to þe Bishop of Rome (and therewith put on his cap) whose vsurped supremacy and abused authority I vtterly refuse and renounce, I may in no wyse giue any obeysaunce or honour vnto hym, lest that my so doing and beha-
[Back to Top]