1570 Edition | Book 8 | Page 1239 
him selfe before, so that they might long looke for hym before he could come. Whiche was an. 1533.
To this story of Panier, may also be added the lyke terrible example of Doct. Foxeford Chauncellour to the Byshop of London, a cruell persecutor and a common butcher of the good Saintes of God: who was the cōdemner of all those aforenamed, which were put to death, troubled, or abiured vnder B. Stokesley through all the dioces of London. MarginaliaThe terrible hand of Gods iudgement vpon Foxford the bishops Chauncellour.Thys Foxford dyed
CloseFoxford died suddenly if perhaps not so dramatically.
MarginaliaThe death of W. Warham Archbi. of Cant.About the same tyme dyed also W. Warrham Archbyshop of Caūterbury:
CloseThe archbishop died on 22 August 1532.
CloseThe Act of Appeals (24 Henry VIII, c.12).
CloseThe council of Chalcedon (451) produced the condemnation of monophysitism and affirmed the two distinct natures of Christ.
CloseFoxe may be here referring to one of many national or plenary Episcopal synods (e.g. Hippo in 393 or Carthage in 407) representing the church in North Africa.
CloseFoxe may be here referring to a synod held at Tolentino.
CloseCatherine's household was established at Ampthill. It was here, on 3 July 1533, she was informed of her official title change from queen to princess dowager.
CloseArchbishop Edward Lee met with Catherine at Ampthill, c.21 May 1533, on the verge of the conclusion of the marriage tribunal at Dunstable.
CloseThe priory at Dunstable was selected due to its remoteness from London, because it was unlikely to be disturbed, and because it was close to Ampthill. Late in April 1533, Cranmer cited Catherine and Henry to appear before this new tribunal [see, L&P, vi, 737 (no.7)] and, on her behalf, ambassador Chapuys sent a letter of protest to the king [see, L&P, vi, 391, 465]. The tribunal opened on 10 May and, because she had not appeared, Catherine was declared 'contumacious' [see, L&P, vi, 470] which, in a legal sense, not only means she refused to abide by the order but also means stubbornly disobedient, wilfully obstinate or even rebellious. Final sentence was rendered on 23 May 1533 [for a discussion, see Andrew A Chibi, Henry VIII's Conservative Scholar (Bern, 1997), pp.82-4].
[Back to Top]MarginaliaA note.¶ Where note that althoughe this diuorce folowyng after the new Mariage, neded not at all to be made, the first Mariage beyng no Mariage at all before God, yet to satisfie the voyce of the people, more then for any necessitie, the kyng was contented, throughe the persuasions of some, so to do. For els as touching God & consciēce, what great nede was of any diuorse, where before God, no Mariage was to be accounted, but rather an incestuous and detestable adultery, as the Acte of Parlament doth terme it? But to our matter agayne.
[Back to Top]After the dissolution of this first Mariage made betwene the kyng and the Lady Princesse Dowager, she neuertheles bearyng a stoute mynde, would not yet relent, neither to the determination of the Vniuersities, nor to the censure of the Clergie, nor of the whole Realme: but folowyng the Counsaile rather of a few Spanyardes, to moleste the kyng and the realme, by suite, and meanes made to the Pope, MarginaliaWrytings sette vp at Dunkerke against the kyng.procured certeine writynges, first of monition and aggrauation, then of excommunication and interdiction to be sent downe frō Rome,
CloseFoxe is here referring to the fact that Catherine's appeal was still very much alive in the courts of Rome, with which Henry VIII still had to deal (largely through his agents there, Edmund Bonner and Sir Edward Carne). The marriage tribunal in Rome proceeded c.6 July 1533 and lasted to 11 July. The final sentencing was not, however, given until 23 March 1534. [See, Henry A Kelly, The Matrimonial trials of Henry VIII (Stanford, 1976), pp.164-70].
[Back to Top]
CloseJohn Butler was a Cranmer protégé, a royal chaplain, and was appointed his commissary of Calais by the archbishop by 1 April 1534. There seems, however, to be a question about the exact dating of his appointment [for which, see Diarmaid MacCulloch, Thomas Cranmer (Yale, 1996), p.113].
MarginaliaK. Henry and the realme interdicted by the pope.After that, before Whitson
CloseThis is Pentecost, seven weeks after Easter (which in 1533 was 23 April).
This beyng knowen and certified vnto the king, he was mocioned by his Coūsaile, that such as were about her, and moued her thereto, should be put frō her. And therfore the Duke of Suffolke
CloseCharles Brandon was sent (c.18 December) to the village of Buckden, where Catherine was lodged at the Great Hall of the palace of Bishop Grossteste since July 1533. [See, Calendar of State Papers, Spanish, iv/ii, pp.892-99; L&P, vi, 622].
CloseFoxe's timing is a little off here as Catherine was moved on (although not a great distance away) to Kimbolton in May 1534.
CloseFoxe's account of the monumental acts of the Reformation Parliament necessarily focused on the 'aboliyshing of the vsurped power and iurisdiction of the bishop of Rome' rather than the establishment of the royal supremacy. The marginal gloss to the 1563 edition, however, provides the key to later historians' interpretations of these events: 'The kinge proclaimed Supreme head by act of parliament'. By the 1570 edition, however, Foxe's marginal glosses subtly altered the message to meet an anticipated objection about the status of a proclamation: 'The stile of supreme head annexed to the crowne of England' adding, for good measure: 'The popes name and memory abolished'. There were other, even more substantial changes wrought by Foxe in this passage as between the 1563 edition and its successors. In 1563, he had said almost nothing about the other, more detailed but substantial measures that accompanied the famous proclamation and which had been turned into statutes by the Reformation Parliament. In 1570, Foxe was anxious to furnish much more substantive detail on the acts in restraint of appeals, payments to Rome, the forbidden degrees, etc. Wherever possible, Foxe also substantially increased the discussion of the ecclesiastical authorities which had supported these political changes, and their scriptural and other grounds for doing so. In the process, Foxe strengthened the impression in his text that these were changes which overthrew a usurpation, justified by law and scripture.
[Back to Top]Andrew ChibiUniversity of Leicester
Marginalia1534.THese thynges thus finished and dispatched concernyng the Mariage of Queene Anne, and the diuorce of Lady Katherine Dowager, next foloweth the yeare. 1434.
CloseA compositor's error. Foxe obviously means 1534. This is corrected in subsequent editions.
CloseThe fourth session of the so-called Reformation parliament assembled on the 4th February 1534. Foxe refers here to what became known as the 'first Act of Succession' (25 Henry VIII, c.22), passed in March, which included a necessary oath.
CloseThe sermons at St Paul's Cross (the outdoor pulpit set in St Paul's churchyard) to which Foxe refers must have been those of Stokesley (26 April 1534) and John Hilsey, bishop of Rochester (early December 1534). [See Millar Maclure, The Paul's Cross Sermons, 1534-1642 (Toronto, 1958), pp.184-5].
MarginaliaEx edou Hallo.After this, Commissions were sent ouer all England, to take the othe of all men & women, to the Acte of succession. At whiche, few repyned, except D. Iohn Fisher Bishop of Rochester
CloseFisher refused to swear on 26 April 1534 and was sent to the Tower as a result.
CloseMore refused to swear on 13 April 1534 and was sent to the Tower as a result.
CloseWilson refused the oath on 13 April along with some other friars of the Charterhouse.